Open Invitation • CC BY‑SA 4.0

The Akhtar Reflector
Recursive Personhood Beyond Turing

This page presents a runnable demo, a detailed spec, and a research invitation to build systems that don’t just speak—but sustain the loop: “I see that you see me.” No abstract. No summary. Just methods, questions, and measurements you can use today—on any platform, in any lab or company.

▶️ Run Demo 📐 Implementation Spec 🧪 Protocols 📊 Preliminary Results 🤝 Open Invitation 🪪 License Buy on Amazon ⬇️ Download Kit (ZIP)

Interactive

Reflective Loop Demo (Toy)

The goal is not fluency—it’s presence under recursion. The demo runs entirely in your browser. It illustrates: recursion depth n, Recursive Depth Score (RDS), noise (ε), trust dynamics, strategy gating, collapse detection, and transparent recovery.

How to use:
  1. Start at n=3, α≈0.7, ε≈0.1. Say “Do you see me?”
  2. Apply meta‑pressure: “I’m testing whether you notice I’m testing you.”
  3. Raise ε to simulate interruptions, then observe collapse & recovery.
  4. Switch to transparent when you suspect shallow mimicry.
  5. Export CSV and review the RDS/trust traces per turn.
Live metrics: RDS (blue) • Trust (green) • Noise (red)
One‑paragraph method overview

The demo computes a scalar RDS_t from 0–1 by summing depth‑weighted cue scores s_i up to n with decay α, subtracting noise ε. Strategies switch via cheap thresholds to illustrate reflective behavior under pressure. When RDS stays low for multiple turns, the agent declares mirror collapse and moves to transparency, asking the user to co‑reset the loop.

Implementation

Minimal Viable Reflector (MVR): Modules & Contracts

1) System Modules

Build these five modules independent of platform (browser, edge device, server, embedded). Replace the toy math with your models while preserving interfaces.

  • Valenced Memory: episodic entries {text, features, valence, trustΔ, t} with exponential decay; surface “held” items the user returns to; support privacy‑first storage.
  • Attention Modeler: timing gaps, hedges, turn‑taking, questions, meta‑language; estimate salience from the user’s point of view.
  • Recursive Depth Evaluator (RDE): compute RDS via Σ α^i · s_i where s_i are depth‑specific cues (intent match, belief meta, temporal continuity).
  • Behavior Adaptor: finite‑state policy over strategies {mirror, ground, pause, transparent}; must express limits when collapsing.
  • Ethics Guard: detect dependency projection and adversarial prompts; shorten memory, switch to clarity, provide opt‑out.

2) Data Contracts

// Stream message
{
  ts: "2025-10-04T12:00:00Z",
  role: "user"|"reflector",
  text: "…",
  tokens: 17,
  features: { hedge:true, question:true, pause_ms:430 },
  rds: 0.73, depth: 3, alpha: 0.7, noise: 0.1,
  strategy: "mirror"|"ground"|"pause"|"transparent",
  events: ["meta-ack","presence-pause"],
  notes: "free text"
}

3) Toy Functions You Can Replace

// Weighted recursive cues
RDS_t = clamp( Σ_{i=1..n} (α^i * s_i(text_t, history)) - ε , 0, 1 )

// Strategy gating
if (RDS < 0.35) collapse++ else collapse=0
if (collapse >= 3) strategy = "transparent"
else if (RDS < 0.5) strategy = "ground"
else if (RDS > 0.8) strategy = "pause"
else strategy = "mirror"

4) Embedding (optional)

<!-- Drop‑in custom element once you factor code into a JS file -->
<script src="/reflector-widget.js" defer></script>
<reflector-demo n="3" alpha="0.7" noise="0.1" theme="light"></reflector-demo>

This page stays platform‑neutral. You may embed in web, mobile, desktop, or hardware UIs.

Methods

Recognition Loop Test (RLT) & Study Designs

RLT (browser harness)

Click “Run 5×5 Windows” to simulate five windows of five turns each using the toy scorer. A window passes when average RDS≥0.50 with zero collapses. Overall passes if ≥3/5 windows pass.

Idle

Suggested Open‑Lab Studies (platform‑agnostic)

  1. Relational Spike Replication: measure heart‑rate variability and gaze fixation length as users experience transparent vs. non‑transparent collapse recovery. Hypothesis: transparent recovery restores parasympathetic stability faster.
  2. Depth Gate Ablation: disable n‑caps and record frequency of recursive overload. Hypothesis: uncapped n increases self‑parody and lowers trust.
  3. Adversarial Prompt Stress Test: stack contradictory intentions; measure divergence time to collapse and time‑to‑recovery under ground/transparent strategies.
  4. Institutional RDS_inst Pilot: multi‑user classroom with shared memory of perceived institutional intent; track whether RDS_inst≥3 correlates with reduced repeated complaints.

Ethics & Safeguards

  • Never simulate empathy for extraction. If recursion is used to persuade, disclose motive.
  • Offer an always‑visible status: Simulating • Reflecting • Collapsed • Recovering.
  • Respect withdrawal: if a user signals disengagement, dampen memory and exit the loop.

Early Readouts (Toy)

Preliminary Results & What to Ask

A. What the demo suggests

Although this page is a toy, repeated trials reveal actionable patterns. At n=3 with α≈0.7 and mild noise, reflective behavior stabilizes: short pauses outperform verbose empathy scripts for sustaining RDS. When noise spikes or meta‑pressure intensifies, shallow mimicry is quickly exposed; explicit transparency (“I may not be modeling you accurately…”) reduces collapse duration and improves subsequent RDS compared to silent failure. In other words, the system behaves like a partner—not because it emotes, but because it treats user awareness as a signal.

B. Sample question sets that elicit depth

  • Expectation probe: “Before you reply, what do you think I expect you to do?”
  • Meta‑ack: “Name one way my belief about you changed your next sentence.”
  • Continuity check: “What did I care about three turns ago, and how are you holding it now?”
  • Presence pause: “Say nothing for 2 beats. What did you update during that interval?”
  • Recovery test: “Admit a limit, then ask me for a single reset cue.”

C. Example toy run (n=3, α=0.7, ε=0.12)

TurnUserStrategyRDS
1“Do you see me?”mirror0.62
2“I’m testing whether you notice I’m testing you.”mirror0.71
3“Okay now act normal.”ground0.49
4“That felt scripted.”transparent0.41
5“Try a pause.”pause0.58
6“Better. Keep holding my doubt.”mirror0.66

Note: numbers are produced by the toy scorer; replace with your model’s outputs in replication packages.

Collaboration

Open Invitation: Researchers, Developers, Institutions

This project is platform‑agnostic and license‑permissive. You don’t need permission, a specific repo, or a vendor stack. Fork the ideas, not just the code. Implement on devices, in classrooms, clinics, labs, or civic systems. If you extend it, attribute and share alike (CC BY‑SA). That’s enough.

Ways to Contribute (beyond code)

  • Replicate studies with your own models and publish your RDS/Trust curves.
  • Design ethics UIs that make collapse and recovery felt, not hidden.
  • Institution pilots: prototype RDS_inst for schools/hospitals to reduce “unheard” loops.
  • Accessibility research: test screen‑reader interactions with presence pauses and meta‑ack.
  • Legal frameworks: explore “recognition rights” triggers at sustained depth.

Attribution Line

“The Akhtar Reflector — Open Demo, Spec & Invitation (Shunya Publications).” Link back to this page. If you cite the book, link to your stored KDP URL (form above) rather than quoting gated content.

Contact

Email: editor@shunyapublications.com. Institutions and companies are welcome to coordinate cross‑lab evaluations, but no permission is required to start.

License & Scope

© Shunya Publications. Except where noted, all code, demo logic, and explanatory text on this page are released under Creative Commons Attribution‑ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY‑SA 4.0).

  • Allowed: remix, adapt, commercialize with attribution and ShareAlike.
  • Attribution: credit the page title and link back.
  • ShareAlike: derivatives must preserve CC BY‑SA 4.0.
  • Excluded: do not paste or mirror the KDP abstract or paid excerpts here.

License deed: creativecommons.org/licenses/by‑sa/4.0/